0 £0.00
This item was added to your basket
Credit Strategy homepage

Dear visitor,
You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

We’ve invested in our content to provide more news, analysis, features, interviews and opinions across a wide range of Credit and Financial Services. Register now to access more of the trustworthy, insightful information that’s on offer.

Register now or Login

Trade body brands civil court alignment fee an “affront to justice” 

Proposals for a civil court alignment fee for money and possession claims will continue a stealth tax on consumers and represent an “affront to justice”, claims the Civil Court Users Association (CCUA). 

Share on LinkedInShare on TwittereCard

This comes as a response to the latest government consultation to align online civil money claims fees with paper application fees.


The proposal aims to ensure that the courts and tribunals have the necessary resources to deliver their services, as well as simplifying the existing fees structure. HM Courts and Tribunal Service’s consultation also states an intention to ensure that those who can afford to pay a fee, pay the same fee regardless of whether they lodge a claim online or via the paper route.


This consultation seeks views on the proposal that the online and paper fees should be aligned to the level of the higher paper fee. The proposal would raise an estimated £12-33m p.a. from 2022/23 onwards if implemented. The CCUA is concerned that fee increases would deny access to justice by deterring claimants from pursuing higher value chains.


The proposal states that the alignment will address the gap following the annual net fee incomes of £721m against the £2bn running costs for the courts.


The CCUA has called this “misleading”, and explained that those figures related to the whole of the service, including family and criminal courts, whereas the proposal only relates to an increase in civil claim fees.


According to the CCUA, HM Courts and Tribunal Service confirmed after a request from the CCUA that in 2018/19, civil claim fees produced an income of £561m whereas only £475m was spent providing the service.


The trade body is calling for a full fee review. It said: “There should be a reduction in the higher existing fee levels. Justice should be affordable. It should not place such a burden upon both claimant and defendant.”

Share on LinkedInShare on TwittereCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Login or Register to access enhanced features of the website.



FCA proposes extending mortgage repossessions suspension 

FCA proposes extending mortgage repossessions suspension 

Listen on demand webinar - How open banking can ensure responsible lending growth

Listen on demand webinar - How open banking can ensure responsible lending growth

Phil Reynolds - 60 second interview

Credit Strategy
LinkedIn page

Member of

Did you find our website useful?

Thank you for your input

Thank you for your feedback

creditstrategy.co.uk – an online news and information service for the UK’s commercial and consumer credit industry. creditstrategy.co.uk is published by Shard Financial Media Limited, registered in England & Wales as 5481132, Axe & Bottle Court, 70 Newcomen St, London, SE1 1YT. All rights reserved. Credit Strategy is committed to diversity in the workplace. @ Copyright Shard Media Group